Palmer v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Palmer v. State

138 S.W. 403, 62 Tex. Crim. 539, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 326

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJune 7, 1911

DocketNo. 1249.

StatusPublished

This text of 138 S.W. 403 (Palmer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Palmer v. State, 138 S.W. 403, 62 Tex. Crim. 539, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 326 (Tex. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

HARPER, Judge.

Appellant was prosecuted under an information and complaint charging him with unlawfully carrying a pistol, and upon conviction his punishment was assessed at a fine of $100.

There are neither bills of exception nor a statement of facts in the record. Attached to the record is a letter written by appellant in which he makes statements that would enlist the sympathy of anyone, but this court is bound by the rules of law, and we can not intentionally ignore the provisions of the law in regard to appeals and the filing of a statement of facts. The complaint and information being in proper form, we assume that the court submitted the law applicable to the case to the jury.

The judgment is affirmed. .

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HARPER, Judge.

Appellant was prosecuted under an information and complaint charging him with unlawfully carrying a pistol, and upon conviction his punishment was assessed at a fine of $100.

There are neither bills of exception nor a statement of facts in the record. Attached to the record is a letter written by appellant in which he makes statements that would enlist the sympathy of anyone, but this court is bound by the rules of law, and we can not intentionally ignore the provisions of the law in regard to appeals and the filing of a statement of facts. The complaint and information being in proper form, we assume that the court submitted the law applicable to the case to the jury.

The judgment is affirmed. .

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

138 S.W. 403, 62 Tex. Crim. 539, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palmer-v-state-texcrimapp-1911.