Gatlin v. State

23 S.W.2d 382, 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1034
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 8, 1930
DocketNo. 12884
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 23 S.W.2d 382 (Gatlin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gatlin v. State, 23 S.W.2d 382, 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1034 (Tex. 1930).

Opinion

HAWKINS, J.

Appellant went to trial upon a complaint and information charging him with cutting timber on land not his own, and without the owner’s consent. We find in the record a verdict finding him guilty and assessing a fine of $20. If any judgment was ever entered on said verdict, the record fails to show it.

Furthermore, it is not shown that any notice of appeal was ever given, or entered of record. Without notice of appeal this court has no jurisdiction. Article 827, C. C. P.; Palmer v. State, 63 Tex. Cr. R. 614, 141 S. W. 109. For further authorities, see notes under article 827, Vernon’s C. C. P., vol. 3, p. 197.

Even if notice of appeal was shown by the record, it does not show a judgment from which an appeal would lie.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Arocha v. State
39 S.W.2d 1097 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 S.W.2d 382, 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1034, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gatlin-v-state-texcrimapp-1930.