Kolos v. State
236 S.W. 473, 90 Tex. Crim. 492, 1922 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 8
Opinion
Conviction is for abusive language, and from some of the recitals in the transcript it appears that a fine of twenty-five dollars was assessed. The transcript bears no caption, is not indexed, contains many instruments not necessary for the transcript to show, and is totally deficient in that no final judgment, or judgment of any kind is shown.
The appeal is therefore ordered dismissed.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kolos v. State, 236 S.W. 473, 90 Tex. Crim. 492, 1922 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 8 (Tex. 1922).
236 S.W. 473 (Kolos v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Martin v. State
28 S.W.2d 140 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1930)