Cane v. State
239 S.W. 948, 91 Tex. Crim. 500, 1922 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 269
Opinion
Judge. The offense is theft, a misdemeanor.
*501 The caption does not name the date upon which the term o£ court began at which the appellant was tried.
No notice of appeal appears in the record; nor is there any final judgment.
For these reasons, the Assistant Attorney General, on behalf of the State, has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cane v. State, 239 S.W. 948, 91 Tex. Crim. 500, 1922 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 269 (Tex. 1922).
239 S.W. 948 (Cane v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Martin v. State
28 S.W.2d 140 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1930)