Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Martin v. State

Martin v. State

132 S.E. 780, 35 Ga. App. 259, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 685
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Martin v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 35 Ga. App. 575 →
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 14, 1926·No. 17169·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

The conviction was fully authorized, and, when the charge of the court is read as a whole, the grounds of the motion for a new trial which attack it, do not require a reversal of the judgment overruling the motion.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., concurs. Bloockoorih, J., not participating, on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. State, 132 S.E. 780, 35 Ga. App. 259, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 685 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

132 S.E. 780 (Martin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.