Martin v. State

142 S.E. 760, 38 Ga. App. 96, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 63
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 10, 1928
Docket18707
StatusPublished

This text of 142 S.E. 760 (Martin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martin v. State, 142 S.E. 760, 38 Ga. App. 96, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 63 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

The motion for a new trial contains no special grounds. The jury were authorized, under the evidence submitted to them, to find the accused guilty, and the court properly overruled the motion.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
142 S.E. 760, 38 Ga. App. 96, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-state-gactapp-1928.