Martin v. State
132 S.E. 780, 35 Ga. App. 259, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 685
This text of 132 S.E. 780 (Martin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Martin v. State, 132 S.E. 780, 35 Ga. App. 259, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 685 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).
Opinion
The conviction was fully authorized, and, when the charge of the court is read as a whole, the grounds of the motion for a new trial which attack it, do not require a reversal of the judgment overruling the motion.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
132 S.E. 780, 35 Ga. App. 259, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-state-gactapp-1926.