Martin v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Martin v. State

117 S.E. 821, 30 Ga. App. 343, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 444

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Martin v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 33 Ga. App. 590 →

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 12, 1923·No. 14448·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

The defendant was convicted of violation of the pro-

hibition statute. He brings his case here for review upon the sola complaint that the evidence does not authorize' the verdict. There being evidence that there was found in his bedroom a quantity of whisky, and under a shelter near the house in which he lived another quantity of intoxicating liquors, and the verdict of the jury having the approval of the trial judge, this court cannot say that it was error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

The defendant was convicted of violation of the pro-

hibition statute. He brings his case here for review upon the sola complaint that the evidence does not authorize' the verdict. There being evidence that there was found in his bedroom a quantity of whisky, and under a shelter near the house in which he lived another quantity of intoxicating liquors, and the verdict of the jury having the approval of the trial judge, this court cannot say that it was error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Martin v. State, 117 S.E. 821, 30 Ga. App. 343, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 444 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

117 S.E. 821 (Martin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.