Martin v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Martin v. State

117 S.E. 821, 30 Ga. App. 343, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 444

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 12, 1923

Docket14448

StatusPublished

This text of 117 S.E. 821 (Martin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martin v. State, 117 S.E. 821, 30 Ga. App. 343, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 444 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

The defendant was convicted of violation of the pro-

hibition statute. He brings his case here for review upon the sola complaint that the evidence does not authorize' the verdict. There being evidence that there was found in his bedroom a quantity of whisky, and under a shelter near the house in which he lived another quantity of intoxicating liquors, and the verdict of the jury having the approval of the trial judge, this court cannot say that it was error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

The defendant was convicted of violation of the pro-

hibition statute. He brings his case here for review upon the sola complaint that the evidence does not authorize' the verdict. There being evidence that there was found in his bedroom a quantity of whisky, and under a shelter near the house in which he lived another quantity of intoxicating liquors, and the verdict of the jury having the approval of the trial judge, this court cannot say that it was error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

117 S.E. 821, 30 Ga. App. 343, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-state-gactapp-1923.