Marshall v. State

448 So. 2d 603
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 17, 1984·No. 83-295, 83-718·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

448 So.2d 603 (1984)

Percival Michael MARSHALL, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 83-295, 83-718.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 17, 1984.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and John H. Lipinski, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Diane Leeds and Richard Doran, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.

Before HENDRY, BARKDULL and BASKIN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the convictions appealed. We remand, however, for the entry of an order detailing the trial court's reasons for retaining *604 jurisdiction in accordance with section 947.16(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1981), and for clarification to reflect that the court retains jurisdiction during one third of the total sentence. Goree v. State, 411 So.2d 1352 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); § 947.16(3), Fla. Stat. (1981).

Affirmed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marshall v. State, 448 So. 2d 603 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

448 So. 2d 603 (Marshall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. State
611 So. 2d 1324 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Diaz v. State
563 So. 2d 199 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Marshall v. Dugger
526 So. 2d 143 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Weaver v. State
466 So. 2d 1196 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)