Weaver v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Weaver v. State

466 So. 2d 1196, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 903, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13343

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 9, 1985

DocketNo. 83-907

StatusPublished

This text of 466 So. 2d 1196 (Weaver v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weaver v. State, 466 So. 2d 1196, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 903, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13343 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the convictions under review. However, we remand the cause for correction of the written sentences so as to make them reflect, consistent with the oral pronouncement of the court, that the trial court retains jurisdiction over one-half of the total consecutive sentences imposed, rather than, as now appears, one-half of each sentence. § 947.16(3), Fla.Stat. (Supp.1982). See Brown v. State, 458 So.2d 1216 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Ferrey v. State, 457 So.2d 1122 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Parson v. State, 450 So.2d 924 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Marshall v. State, 448 So.2d 603 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Wicker v. State, 445 So.2d 583 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Wicker v. State, 438 So.2d 399 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Wicker v. State, 438 So.2d 398 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Adams v. State, 435 So.2d 953 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Goree v. State, 411 So.2d 1352 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

Affirmed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the convictions under review. However, we remand the cause for correction of the written sentences so as to make them reflect, consistent with the oral pronouncement of the court, that the trial court retains jurisdiction over one-half of the total consecutive sentences imposed, rather than, as now appears, one-half of each sentence. § 947.16(3), Fla.Stat. (Supp.1982). See Brown v. State, 458 So.2d 1216 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Ferrey v. State, 457 So.2d 1122 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Parson v. State, 450 So.2d 924 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Marshall v. State, 448 So.2d 603 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Wicker v. State, 445 So.2d 583 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Wicker v. State, 438 So.2d 399 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Wicker v. State, 438 So.2d 398 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Adams v. State, 435 So.2d 953 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Goree v. State, 411 So.2d 1352 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

Affirmed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

466 So. 2d 1196, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 903, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weaver-v-state-fladistctapp-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack