Marshall v. State

449 So. 2d 1306, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13456
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Marshall v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 439 So. 2d 973
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 17, 1984·No. No. 82-1559·Published

Opinion

COBB, Judge.

With some misgiving, we affirm Marshall’s, judgment and sentence. That misgiving is occasioned by the fact that the record before us indicates prosecutorial misconduct, including contact and negotiation with the defendant by an assistant state attorney without notice to the defendant’s counsel of record.

Nevertheless, there is no question here as to the guilt of the defendant, which he acknowledged in a nolo contendere plea before the trial court and which readily could have been established even in the absence of the aforesaid misconduct. See Hampton v. United States, 425 U.S. 484, 96 S.Ct. 1646, 48 L.Ed.2d 113 (1976); Lawrence v. State, 357 So.2d 424 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978), cert. denied, 367 So.2d 1125 (Fla. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 847, 100 S.Ct. 94, 62 L.Ed.2d 61 (1979).

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, C.J., and LEE, R.E., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marshall v. State, 449 So. 2d 1306, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13456 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

449 So. 2d 1306 (Marshall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hampton v. United States
425 U.S. 484 (Supreme Court, 1976)
Lawrence v. State
357 So. 2d 424 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)