Marshall v. State
This text of 448 So. 2d 603 (Marshall v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Percival Michael MARSHALL, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and John H. Lipinski, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Diane Leeds and Richard Doran, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.
Before HENDRY, BARKDULL and BASKIN, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the convictions appealed. We remand, however, for the entry of an order detailing the trial court's reasons for retaining *604 jurisdiction in accordance with section 947.16(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1981), and for clarification to reflect that the court retains jurisdiction during one third of the total sentence. Goree v. State, 411 So.2d 1352 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); § 947.16(3), Fla. Stat. (1981).
Affirmed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
448 So. 2d 603, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marshall-v-state-fladistctapp-1984.