Marshall v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Marshall v. State

428 So. 2d 291, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 27923

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 15, 1983

DocketNo. 82-1749

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 428 So. 2d 291 (Marshall v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marshall v. State, 428 So. 2d 291, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 27923 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that the appellant’s motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 was filed and considered and ruled upon by the trial court while appellant’s petition for review to the Florida Supreme Court was pending, and that jurisdiction to consider the Rule 3.850 motion was not relinquished to the trial court, the trial court’s denial of the appellant’s Rule 3.850 motion is affirmed on the sole ground that the trial court was without jurisdiction over the motion, without prejudice to the right of the appellant to file such motion after disposition of his pending appeal and the return of jurisdiction to the trial court. See State v. Meneses, 392 So.2d 905 (Fla.1981).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that the appellant’s motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 was filed and considered and ruled upon by the trial court while appellant’s petition for review to the Florida Supreme Court was pending, and that jurisdiction to consider the Rule 3.850 motion was not relinquished to the trial court, the trial court’s denial of the appellant’s Rule 3.850 motion is affirmed on the sole ground that the trial court was without jurisdiction over the motion, without prejudice to the right of the appellant to file such motion after disposition of his pending appeal and the return of jurisdiction to the trial court. See State v. Meneses, 392 So.2d 905 (Fla.1981).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

428 So. 2d 291, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 27923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marshall-v-state-fladistctapp-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack