Sumpter v. State

523 So. 2d 806, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1013, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1658, 1988 WL 36942
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 26, 1988
DocketNo. 87-3060
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 523 So. 2d 806 (Sumpter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sumpter v. State, 523 So. 2d 806, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1013, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1658, 1988 WL 36942 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850, was filed while his appeal to this court (No. 87-1969) was pending and without jurisdiction having been relinquished to the trial court to consider the motion. We affirm the denial of the motion upon a holding that the trial court was without jurisdiction to consider it. State v. Meneses, 392 So.2d 905 (Fla. 1981); Bryan v. State, 470 So.2d 864 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Marshall v. State, 428 So.2d 291 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). Our affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s right to file such motion after disposition of his pending appeal and the return of jurisdiction to the trial court.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Campbell v. State
543 So. 2d 885 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
523 So. 2d 806, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1013, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1658, 1988 WL 36942, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sumpter-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.