Marcus v. Eastern Agricultural Ass'n, Inc.
This text of 161 A.2d 247 (Marcus v. Eastern Agricultural Ass'n, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment is reversed for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Conford in the court below.
Mr. Justice Hall votes to affirm the judgment for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Mintz.
For reversal—Chief Justice Weintbaub, and Justices Burling, Jacobs, Francis, Proctor and Schettino—6.
For affirmance—Justice Hall—1.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
161 A.2d 247, 32 N.J. 460, 1960 N.J. LEXIS 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marcus-v-eastern-agricultural-assn-inc-nj-1960.