Manuel Ruiz Constancio v. State
This text of Manuel Ruiz Constancio v. State (Manuel Ruiz Constancio v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED JANUARY 13, 2016
NO. 03-14-00411-CR
Manuel Ruiz Constancio, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
APPEAL FROM 51ST DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE
This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction signed by the trial court. Having reviewed the
record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the trial
court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of
conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is
made.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Manuel Ruiz Constancio v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manuel-ruiz-constancio-v-state-texapp-2016.