Manuel Ruiz Constancio v. State

Opinion

-XW rut TH/ieb September 30, 2015 Coazrz OP APf£AU AT AUSTIN, TXXAS

MAflJlASL /£U!2. COAJSTAWClO ~p/eo - S£ V.

TVfe sdvtt of 7xxas

APP£AL DP £/4u$£ MurvtB.2ft o^-W-^o«f»i-CR F/o>»m th£ SI4* Jubei>H_ fcirreicT Court" of

To Trtf Ho«ooRft^L£ JlASnfits of th£ comrrr of rt?feA\-c:

CAHfiS MOU KWAftiuCL RUra. CoiUST/iWcl^ja^/'i'iLAMT'c Rsfi-ss. Avafc 2C&9ZCT-PULI.V Mcvzc T«£ £<ju*?T To CJdlwO -TUC tJCA&U%lC £/wa FUUHG KiS B.C.K.F OB. R£StbM5t tV MIUXLTY bMS. XM Support Atfcu-Aur «uouLt 2Hoa TH£ FCLLao iti&r:

u^s ansa,?^r^nrr^^€T"r^^f rs^^w.rrjsrw,s in:

SiWCt my ArnxtiM wrTHDCAy ««m «iv case x /wurr bo my ftuMd. Ac P~ tt -«» . .„ *, , .,

»^^Sg"S ^V^^SSSk^lgZ^ *'«**™ <"»<™<"- «,«rrDAY5 to Ccmputc ™»«

Mauucl fcufc.coiusrAweio _£?*r Jro^roni TRftwsfte facility 'RECEIVED> 1536 EfiST XH-lo SEP SOWS I fo/fr STixrroA), TX 7<?73S

5 r* -r>'

X£

O

-J

-J CD -J

04

in

*^ 51 a 70 *H

t.j

3b^

o v« "s

t

\ % \t \i

-J* / S t i r I

< / i I

3? in

~ ' n 3> ~ (71 r Lo