Manuel Ruiz Constancio v. State
This text of Manuel Ruiz Constancio v. State (Manuel Ruiz Constancio v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-14-00411-CR
Manuel Ruiz Constancio, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY, 51ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. A-11-0535-S, HONORABLE JAY K. WEATHERBY, JUDGE PRESIDING
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
Manuel Ruiz Constancio filed his notice of appeal on May 27, 2014, and his brief was
due December 24, 2014, but was never filed. On February 9, 2015, this Court sent an overdue-brief
notice to Constancio’s appointed counsel, Shawntell McKillop, who failed to provide any response.
The appeal is abated. The district court shall conduct a hearing to determine
whether Constancio desires to prosecute this appeal, whether he is indigent, whether Ms. McKillop
has abandoned this appeal, and if so, whether new counsel should be appointed. See Tex. R. App.
P. 38.8(b)(2). A supplemental clerk’s record containing copies of all findings and orders from this
hearing and a transcription of the court reporter’s notes, shall be filed with this Court no later than
April 27, 2015. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(3). It is ordered on March 26, 2015.
Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Goodwin and Field
Abated and Remanded
Filed: March 26, 2015
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Manuel Ruiz Constancio v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manuel-ruiz-constancio-v-state-texapp-2015.