Manuel Ruiz Constancio v. State
Opinion
ACCEPTED
03-14-00411-CR
6695783
THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
AUSTIN, TEXAS
8/28/2015 10:28:30 AM
JEFFREY D. KYLE
CLERK
FILED IN
3rd COURT OF APPEALS
AUSTIN, TEXAS
ALLISON PALMER GEORGE E. McCREA 8/28/2015 10:28:30 AM
51ST & 119TH DISTRICT ATTORNEYS JEFFREY D. KYLE 124 W. Beauregard Clerk
San Angelo, Texas 76903
325/659-6583 325/655-6116 325/658-6831 (Fax)
August 28, 2015
Jeffrey D. Kyle, Clerk Third Court of Appeals P.O. Box 12547 Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711
Style: Manuel Ruiz Constancio, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Case # 03-14-00411-CR Trial Court# A-11-0535-S, 51st District Court
Dear Mr. Kyle:
The State believes that the trial court ruled correctly in this case.
With regard to the Anders brief filed by Appellant, the State hereby notifies the Court that it will not respond on the merits to the points raised and conceded by Appellant’s brief. Please file this letter response with the papers in the cause and bring it to the attention of the appropriate members of the Court or its staff.
Sincerely,
Meagan White Asst. District Attorney 51st Judicial District 124 W Beauregard, Ste. B San Angelo, TX 76903 (325) 659-6583 (325) 658-6831 FAX TSB# 24060973 cc: Shawntell McKillop 25 West Beauregard San Angelo, TX 76903 Delivered via https://efile.txcourts.gov/ to mckillopattorney@hotmail.com
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Manuel Ruiz Constancio v. State (Manuel Ruiz Constancio v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.