Manuel Ruiz Constancio v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 28, 2015·No. 03-14-00411-CR·Published

Opinion

ACCEPTED

03-14-00411-CR

6695783

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

8/28/2015 10:28:30 AM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

FILED IN

3rd COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

ALLISON PALMER GEORGE E. McCREA 8/28/2015 10:28:30 AM

51ST & 119TH DISTRICT ATTORNEYS JEFFREY D. KYLE 124 W. Beauregard Clerk

San Angelo, Texas 76903

325/659-6583 325/655-6116 325/658-6831 (Fax)

August 28, 2015

Jeffrey D. Kyle, Clerk Third Court of Appeals P.O. Box 12547 Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711

Style: Manuel Ruiz Constancio, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Case # 03-14-00411-CR Trial Court# A-11-0535-S, 51st District Court

Dear Mr. Kyle:

The State believes that the trial court ruled correctly in this case.

With regard to the Anders brief filed by Appellant, the State hereby notifies the Court that it will not respond on the merits to the points raised and conceded by Appellant’s brief. Please file this letter response with the papers in the cause and bring it to the attention of the appropriate members of the Court or its staff.

Sincerely,

Meagan White Asst. District Attorney 51st Judicial District 124 W Beauregard, Ste. B San Angelo, TX 76903 (325) 659-6583 (325) 658-6831 FAX TSB# 24060973 cc: Shawntell McKillop 25 West Beauregard San Angelo, TX 76903 Delivered via https://efile.txcourts.gov/ to mckillopattorney@hotmail.com

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Manuel Ruiz Constancio v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Manuel Ruiz Constancio v. State (Manuel Ruiz Constancio v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.