Malot v. Roy F. Weston, Inc.
This text of 39 F.3d 1194 (Malot v. Roy F. Weston, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
39 F.3d 1194
NOTICE: Eleventh Circuit Rule 36-2 states that unpublished opinions are not considered binding precedent. They may be cited as persuasive authority, provided that a copy of the unpublished opinion is attached to or incorporated within the brief, petition or motion.
James J. MALOT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ROY F. WESTON, INC. and Weston Services, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 94-1446.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Sept. 19, 1994.
N.D.Ga.
APPEAL DEACTIVATED.
ORDER
On consideration of the notice of appeal, a motion of the type enumerated in Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(4) having been filed in the United States District Court/NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA rendering the notice of appeal ineffective, it is
ORDERED that the appeal be, and it hereby is, DEACTIVATED.
The appeal will be REACTIVATED upon entry of the order disposing of the last such motion outstanding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
39 F.3d 1194, 1994 WL 534738, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/malot-v-roy-f-weston-inc-ca11-1994.