Leo J. Oros and Leo E. Oros, and Environmental Process Equipment, Inc. v. Enviroquip, Inc.

39 F.3d 1194, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 25974, 1994 WL 513628
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided September 7, 1994·No. 94-1373·Unpublished

Opinion

39 F.3d 1194

NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
Leo J. OROS and Leo E. Oros, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
and
Environmental Process Equipment, Inc., Plaintiff,
v.
ENVIROQUIP, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 94-1373.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Sept. 7, 1994.

DISMISSED.

ORDER

The appellant having failed to file the brief required by Federal Circuit Rule 31(a) within the time permitted by the rules, it is

ORDERED that the notice of appeal be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leo J. Oros and Leo E. Oros, and Environmental Process Equipment, Inc. v. Enviroquip, Inc., 39 F.3d 1194, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 25974, 1994 WL 513628 (Fed. Cir. 1994).

39 F.3d 1194 (Leo J. Oros and Leo E. Oros, and Environmental Process Equipment, Inc. v. Enviroquip, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Malot v. Roy F. Weston, Inc.
39 F.3d 1194 (Eleventh Circuit, 1994)