In Re Edward Zager and Gregory Mathews
This text of 39 F.3d 1194 (In Re Edward Zager and Gregory Mathews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
IN re Edward ZAGER and Gregory Mathews.
No. 94-1465.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Sept. 8, 1994.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
ON MOTION
ORDER
Upon consideration of the unopposed motion of Edward Zager and Gregory Mathews to voluntarily to dismiss their appeal,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) The motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed.
(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
39 F.3d 1194, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 37632, 1994 WL 513649, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-edward-zager-and-gregory-mathews-cafc-1994.