Helen J. Lipscomb v. Merit Systems Protection Board
This text of 39 F.3d 1194 (Helen J. Lipscomb v. Merit Systems Protection Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
Helen J. LIPSCOMB, Petitioner,
v.
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.
No. 94-3560.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Sept. 12, 1994.
MSPB
MOTION GRANTED.
ON MOTION
ORDER
SCHALL, Circuit Judge.
The Department of Defense moves to reform the caption to designate the Merit Systems Protection Board as the respondent. The Board moves to remand to the Board to further consider the timeliness of Helen F. Lipscomb's appeal. The motions are unopposed.
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) The motion to reform the caption is granted and the revised official caption is reflected above.
(2) The motion to remand is granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
39 F.3d 1194, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 37638, 1994 WL 516875, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/helen-j-lipscomb-v-merit-systems-protection-board-cafc-1994.