Mack v. State

837 So. 2d 524, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1239, 2003 WL 252862
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mack v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15162
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 6, 2003·No. No. 1D02-2560·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Willie C. Mack, appeals from the summary denial of his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We find that all but one of the grounds asserted by Mack are without merit. See Floyd v. State, 808 So.2d 175 (Fla.2002). Because we find that Mack stated a facially sufficient claim of ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to investigate or call alibi witnesses which was not conclusively refuted by the record attachments to the trial court’s denial, we reverse and remand with directions to attach additional portions of the record conclusively refuting Mack’s claim, or to conduct an evidentiary hearing.

DAVIS, BROWNING and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mack v. State, 837 So. 2d 524, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1239, 2003 WL 252862 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

837 So. 2d 524 (Mack v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Floyd v. State
808 So. 2d 175 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)