Mack v. State

823 So. 2d 841, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 11705, 2002 WL 1877044
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mack v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15162
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 16, 2002·No. No. 2D02-2290·Published

Opinions

BLUE, Chief Judge.

Nathan Mack challenges the order of the trial court entered after this court remanded to the trial court to determine the legality of Mack’s habitual offender sentence on his kidnapping conviction. See Mack v. State, 814 So.2d 1107 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). The trial court correctly determined that the jury found Mack guilty of kidnapping with a firearm; that it was required to enhance the kidnapping conviction from a first-degree felony to a life felony pursuant to section 775.087(2), Florida Statutes (1989); and that a life felony was not subject to habitual offender sentencing under the 1989 habitual offender statute. See id. We therefore affirm that portion of the order striking Mack’s habitual offender designation on the armed kidnapping conviction but reverse the life sentence and remand with instructions to the trial court to resentence Mack within the sentencing guidelines on that count only. See Collins v. State, 800 So.2d 660 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further proceedings.

SALCINES, J., Concurs. ALTENBERND, J., Concurs with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mack v. State, 823 So. 2d 841, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 11705, 2002 WL 1877044 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

823 So. 2d 841 (Mack v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Collins v. State
800 So. 2d 660 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Mack v. State
814 So. 2d 1107 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)