Lynch v. Hazelwood

324 S.E.2d 224, 312 N.C. 224
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 8, 1985·No. 327PA84·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

324 S.E.2d 224 (1985)
312 N.C. 224

Tina Darlene LYNCH
v.
Harry Aldene HAZELWOOD.

No. 327PA84.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 8, 1985.

Pollock, Fullenwider, Cunningham & Patterson by Bruce T. Cunningham, Jr., Southern Pines, for plaintiff-appellant.

Staton, Perkinson, West & Doster by Norman C. Post, Jr., Sanford, for defendant-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The Court is evenly divided. Under these circumstances, following the uniform practice of this Court and the ancient rule of praesumitur pro negante, the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed, not as precedent but as the decision in this case. Durham v. R.R., 113 N.C. 240, 18 S.E. 208 (1893); Reg. v. Millis, 8 Eng.Rep. 844 (1844).

AFFIRMED.

VAUGHN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lynch v. Hazelwood, 324 S.E.2d 224, 312 N.C. 224 (N.C. 1985).

324 S.E.2d 224 (Lynch v. Hazelwood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission & Duke Power Co. v. Eddleman
358 S.E.2d 339 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1987)
In Re the Appeal of K-Mart Corp.
354 S.E.2d 468 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1987)
Vick v. Davis
345 S.E.2d 217 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1986)
State v. Moore
343 S.E.2d 430 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1986)