Vick v. Davis
345 S.E.2d 217, 317 N.C. 328, 1986 N.C. LEXIS 2793
Opinion
Justice Martin having recused, the Court is evenly divided. Under these circumstances, following the uniform practice of this Court, the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed, not as *329 precedent but as the decision in this case. Lynch v. Hazelwood, 312 N.C. 619, 324 S.E. 2d 224 (1985).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Vick v. Davis, 345 S.E.2d 217, 317 N.C. 328, 1986 N.C. LEXIS 2793 (N.C. 1986).
345 S.E.2d 217 (Vick v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kornegay v. Aspen Asset Group, LLC
693 S.E.2d 723 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2010)
Clark v. Alan Vester Auto Group, Inc.
2009 NCBC 18 (North Carolina Business Court, 2009)
Essex Group, Inc. v. Express Wire Services, Inc.
578 S.E.2d 705 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2003)
Atlantic Veneer Corp. v. Robbins
516 S.E.2d 169 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1999)
Hursey v. Homes by Design, Inc.
464 S.E.2d 504 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1995)