Lynch v. Hazelwood
324 S.E.2d 224, 312 N.C. 619, 1985 N.C. LEXIS 1483
Opinion
The Court is evenly divided. Under these circumstances, following the uniform practice of this Court and the ancient rule of praesumitur pro negante, the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed, not as precedent but as the decision in this case. Durham v. R.R., 113 N.C. 240, 18 S.E. 208 (1893); Reg. v. Millis, 8 Eng. Rep. 844 (1844).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lynch v. Hazelwood, 324 S.E.2d 224, 312 N.C. 619, 1985 N.C. LEXIS 1483 (N.C. 1985).
324 S.E.2d 224 (Lynch v. Hazelwood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission & Duke Power Co. v. Eddleman
358 S.E.2d 339 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1987)
In Re the Appeal of K-Mart Corp.
354 S.E.2d 468 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1987)
Vick v. Davis
345 S.E.2d 217 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1986)
State v. Moore
343 S.E.2d 430 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1986)