Lucas v. North Carolina Bank & Trust Co.

174 S.E. 301, 206 N.C. 909, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 350
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided May 2, 1934·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

Pee Cubiam.

The demurrer was properly sustained on the ground of a misjoinder of both parties and causes of action. Williams v. Gooch, ante, 330; Carswell v. Whisenant, 203 N. C., 674, 166 S. E., 793; Grady v. Warren, 201 N. C., 693, 161 S. E., 319; Sasser v. Bullard, 199 N. C., 562, 155 S. E., 248. The several causes of action, united in the same complaint, do not “affect all the parties to the action,” as required by C. S., 507.

"Where this dual misjoinder occurs, and a demurrer is accordingly interposed, the decisions are to the effect that the action should be dismissed. Shuford v. Yarbrough, 198 N. C., 5, 150 S. E., 618; Roberts v. Mfg. Co., 181 N. C., 204, 106 S. E., 664.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lucas v. North Carolina Bank & Trust Co., 174 S.E. 301, 206 N.C. 909, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 350 (N.C. 1934).

174 S.E. 301 (Lucas v. North Carolina Bank & Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McEachern v. Miller
151 S.E.2d 209 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1966)
Monroe v. Dietenhoffer
142 S.E.2d 135 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1965)
Kearns v. Primm
139 S.E.2d 697 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1965)
Nye v. Pure Oil Co.
126 S.E.2d 48 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1962)
Chambers v. Dalton
76 S.E.2d 162 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)
Moore County v. . Burns
32 S.E.2d 225 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1944)
Burleson v. . Burleson
7 S.E.2d 706 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1940)
Atkins v. . Steed
179 S.E. 889 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1935)
Fertilizer Co v. . Bowen
176 S.E. 565 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1934)
Farmville Oil & Fertilizer Co. v. Bowen
176 S.E. 565 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1934)