Carswell Ex Rel. Carswell v. Whisenant

166 S.E. 793, 203 N.C. 674, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 74
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 14, 1932·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Connor J.

Conceding without deciding that a cause of action is alleged in the complaint against the defendant, town of Morganton, for damages resulting from the failure of said defendant to discharge the duties imposed by law upon said defendant, while the plaintiff was confined in the county jail of Burke County, we are of opinion that nevertheless, the demurrer was properly sustained for the reason that there is a misjoinder in the complaint of both parties and causes of action. In such case, the decisions of this Court are to the effect that the demurrer should be sustained and the action dismissed. Sasser v. Bullard, 199 N. C., 562, 155 S. E., 248, and cases cited in the opinion in that case. The judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carswell Ex Rel. Carswell v. Whisenant, 166 S.E. 793, 203 N.C. 674, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 74 (N.C. 1932).

166 S.E. 793 (Carswell Ex Rel. Carswell v. Whisenant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mills v. North Carolina Joint Stock Land Bank
182 S.E. 336 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1935)
Lucas v. North Carolina Bank & Trust Co.
174 S.E. 301 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1934)