Mills v. North Carolina Joint Stock Land Bank

182 S.E. 336, 208 N.C. 674, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 96
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 1, 1935·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

Plaintiffs have incorporated three causes of action in the same complaint. The first two arise out of the insurance policy issued by the Virginia Eire and Marine Insurance Company; the other is based on a deed of trust given to secure a loan from the North Carolina Joint Stock Land Bank. The several causes do not affect all the parties to the action. C. S., 507. The complaint, therefore, is bad as against a demurrer. Atkins v. Steed, ante, 245, and cases there cited.

Dual misjoinder of parties and causes works a dismissal upon demurrer. Carswell v. Whisenant, 203 N. C., 674, 166 S. E., 793; Shuford v. Yarbrough, 198 N. C., 5, 150 S. E., 618; Shemwell v. Lethco, 198 N. C., 346, 151 S. E., 729; Bank v. Angelo, 193 N. C., 576, 137 S. E., 705; Shore v. Holt, 185 N. C., 312, 117 S. E., 165.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mills v. North Carolina Joint Stock Land Bank, 182 S.E. 336, 208 N.C. 674, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 96 (N.C. 1935).

182 S.E. 336 (Mills v. North Carolina Joint Stock Land Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McKinley v. Hinnant
87 S.E.2d 568 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1955)
Mills v. CAROLINA CEMETERY PARK CORPORATION
86 S.E.2d 893 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1955)
Casey v. Grantham
79 S.E.2d 735 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1954)
Wingler v. . Miller
19 S.E.2d 247 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1942)