Roberts v. Utility Manufacturing Co.
This text of 106 S.E. 664 (Roberts v. Utility Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The causes of action that may be joined are classified im section 507 of the Consolidated Statutes, which concludes: “Rut the-causes of action' so united must all belong to one of these classes, and except in actions for the foreclosure of mortgages, must affect all the-parties to the action.”
It is also well settled that an action cannot be divided under section 516 when there is a misjoinder both of parties and of causes of action, and that in such case the demurrer must be sustained and the action dismissed. Cromartie v. Parker, 121 N. C., 198; Morton v. Tel. Co., 130 N. C., 299; Thigpen v. Cotton Mills, 151 N. C., 97; Campbell v. Power Co., 166 N. C., 488.
Applying these principles it is clear that the demurrer ought to have-been sustained.
There are two plaintiffs, Owen IT. Roberts and D. B. Roberts, and there are at least three causes of action set out, all of which do not affect all of the parties to the action, as required by the statute.
The plaintiffs allege, first, a breach of- a contract made by the defendant with O. H. Roberts, and assigned by him to the other plaintiff,. D. B. Roberts. Next, a breach of a separate and distinct contract made by the defendant with both of the plaintiffs, and in the third place, a breach of a contract made by the defendant with the plaintiff, O. EL, Roberts.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
106 S.E. 664, 181 N.C. 204, 1921 N.C. LEXIS 42, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-utility-manufacturing-co-nc-1921.