Farmville Oil & Fertilizer Co. v. Bowen

176 S.E. 565, 207 N.C. 308, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 452
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedOctober 31, 1934
StatusPublished

This text of 176 S.E. 565 (Farmville Oil & Fertilizer Co. v. Bowen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Farmville Oil & Fertilizer Co. v. Bowen, 176 S.E. 565, 207 N.C. 308, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 452 (N.C. 1934).

Opinion

Pee Ouexam.

The third cause of action is based upon a separate and distinct tort in the nature of abuse of process, and hence could not be properly joined with the other causes of action constituting a counterclaim. R. R. v. Nichols, 187 N. C., 153, 120 S. E., 819; Sasser v. Bullard, 199 N. C., 562, 155 S. E., 248; Williams v. Gooch, 206 N. C., 330; Lucas and Lewis v. North Carolina Bank and Trust Co., 206 N. C., 909.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sasser v. . Bullard
155 S.E. 248 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)
Williams v. . Gooch
173 S.E. 342 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1934)
Lucas v. North Carolina Bank & Trust Co.
174 S.E. 301 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1934)
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Nichols
120 S.E. 819 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
176 S.E. 565, 207 N.C. 308, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farmville-oil-fertilizer-co-v-bowen-nc-1934.