Farmville Oil & Fertilizer Co. v. Bowen
176 S.E. 565, 207 N.C. 308, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 452
Opinion
The third cause of action is based upon a separate and distinct tort in the nature of abuse of process, and hence could not be properly joined with the other causes of action constituting a counterclaim. R. R. v. Nichols, 187 N. C., 153, 120 S. E., 819; Sasser v. Bullard, 199 N. C., 562, 155 S. E., 248; Williams v. Gooch, 206 N. C., 330; Lucas and Lewis v. North Carolina Bank and Trust Co., 206 N. C., 909.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Farmville Oil & Fertilizer Co. v. Bowen, 176 S.E. 565, 207 N.C. 308, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 452 (N.C. 1934).
176 S.E. 565 (Farmville Oil & Fertilizer Co. v. Bowen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sasser v. . Bullard
155 S.E. 248 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)
Williams v. . Gooch
173 S.E. 342 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1934)
Lucas v. North Carolina Bank & Trust Co.
174 S.E. 301 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1934)
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Nichols
120 S.E. 819 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1924)