Louisiana ex rel. Guste v. Verity

Fifth Circuit

Louisiana ex rel. Guste v. Verity

850 F.2d 211, 1988 WL 70149

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedJuly 11, 1988

DocketNo. 88-3185

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 850 F.2d 211 (Louisiana ex rel. Guste v. Verity) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Louisiana ex rel. Guste v. Verity, 850 F.2d 211, 1988 WL 70149 (5th Cir. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

For reasons to be assigned in an opinion to be issued in due course, the judgment of the district court dismissing this action is AFFIRMED. The district court’s order staying execution of its judgment is VACATED effective 11:59 p.m., August 31, 1988. If appellants wish to apply to the Supreme Court of the United States for a further stay of judgment or for other relief, application should be made during the pendency of the stay as announced herein, as no further stays will be granted by this court.

SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

For reasons to be assigned in an opinion to be issued in due course, the judgment of the district court dismissing this action is AFFIRMED. The district court’s order staying execution of its judgment is VACATED effective 11:59 p.m., August 31, 1988. If appellants wish to apply to the Supreme Court of the United States for a further stay of judgment or for other relief, application should be made during the pendency of the stay as announced herein, as no further stays will be granted by this court.

SO ORDERED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

850 F.2d 211, 1988 WL 70149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louisiana-ex-rel-guste-v-verity-ca5-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack