Locklear v. Stansberry

139 F. App'x 564
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Locklear v. Stansberry. Read the opinion of the Court — 146 F. App'x 654
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 25, 2005·No. No. 05-6032·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jimmy Locklear, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order [565]*565denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and have found no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Locklear v. Stansberry, No. CA-04-802-5-H (E.D.N.C. Dec. 14, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Locklear v. Stansberry, 139 F. App'x 564 (4th Cir. 2005).

139 F. App'x 564 (Locklear v. Stansberry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241