Locklear v. Stansberry

Fourth Circuit

Locklear v. Stansberry

146 F. App'x 654

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 21, 2005·No. No. 05-6255·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jimmy Locklear appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Locklear v. Stansberry, No. CA-04-936 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 27, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Jimmy Locklear appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Locklear v. Stansberry, No. CA-04-936 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 27, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Locklear v. Stansberry, 146 F. App'x 654 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

146 F. App'x 654 (Locklear v. Stansberry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related