Locklear v. Stansberry

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: April 21, 2005
• Docket: 19-1005
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6177

KENNETH DWAYNE LOCKLEAR,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-04-856)

Submitted: April 14, 2005 Decided: April 21, 2005

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Dwayne Locklear, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Dwayne Locklear, a federal prisoner, appeals from

the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 28

U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition, which challenged the Bureau of

Prison’s computation of good time credits, for failure to exhaust

administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. Locklear v. Stansberry, No. CA-04-856

(E.D.N.C. filed Dec. 14, 2004; entered Dec. 27, 2004). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -