Locklear v. Stansberry

126 F. App'x 153
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Locklear v. Stansberry. Read the opinion of the Court — 146 F. App'x 654
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 21, 2005·No. No. 05-6177·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Dwayne Locklear, a federal prisoner, appeals from the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition, which challenged the Bureau of Prison’s computation of good time credits, for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Locklear v. Stansberry, No. CA-04-856 (E.D.N.C. filed Dec. 14, 2004; entered Dec. 27, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Locklear v. Stansberry, 126 F. App'x 153 (4th Cir. 2005).

126 F. App'x 153 (Locklear v. Stansberry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241