Locklear v. Stansberry

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Locklear v. Stansberry. Read the opinion of the Court — 146 F. App'x 654
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 25, 2005·No. 05-6032·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6032

JIMMY LOCKLEAR,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden, LSCI Butner,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-04-802-5-H)

Submitted: June 22, 2005 Decided: July 25, 2005

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jimmy Locklear, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Jimmy Locklear, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the

district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under

28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) for failure to exhaust administrative

remedies. We have reviewed the record and have found no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See Locklear v. Stansberry, No. CA-04-802-5-H

(E.D.N.C. Dec. 14, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Locklear v. Stansberry, (4th Cir. 2005).

Locklear v. Stansberry (Locklear v. Stansberry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241