Locklear v. Stansberry
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6032
JIMMY LOCKLEAR,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden, LSCI Butner,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-04-802-5-H)
Submitted: June 22, 2005 Decided: July 25, 2005
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jimmy Locklear, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Jimmy Locklear, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the
district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under
28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) for failure to exhaust administrative
remedies. We have reviewed the record and have found no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Locklear v. Stansberry, No. CA-04-802-5-H
(E.D.N.C. Dec. 14, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Locklear v. Stansberry (Locklear v. Stansberry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.