Lo Presti v. Lo Presti

51 A.D.2d 578, 378 N.Y.S.2d 487, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10865
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 26, 1976·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

In a habeas corpus proceeding pursuant to section 72 of the Domestic Relations Law to determine the visitation rights of the petitioner grandparents, petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Family Court, Orange County, dated September 5, 1975, which, after a hearing, inter alia dismissed the proceeding. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs, writ sustained, and matter remanded to the Family Court for further proceedings consistent herewith. Animosity between the mother of the children and their grandparents is not a proper basis for the denial of visitation privileges to the grandparents; nor is it a proper yardstick by which to measure the best interests of the children. Accordingly, the instant writ should have been sustained. We have remanded the matter to the Family Court to fix the visitation privileges of the grandparents. Gulotta, P. J., Latham, Margett, Damiani and Christ, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lo Presti v. Lo Presti, 51 A.D.2d 578, 378 N.Y.S.2d 487, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10865 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

51 A.D.2d 578 (Lo Presti v. Lo Presti) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Jones
155 Misc. 2d 254 (NYC Family Court, 1992)
In Re Custody of Banning
541 N.E.2d 283 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1989)
Collins v. Gilbreath
403 N.E.2d 921 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1980)
Lo Presti v. Lo Presti
54 A.D.2d 582 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Vacula v. Blume
53 A.D.2d 633 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)