Vacula v. Blume

53 A.D.2d 633, 384 N.Y.S.2d 208, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13341
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 7, 1976
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 53 A.D.2d 633 (Vacula v. Blume) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vacula v. Blume, 53 A.D.2d 633, 384 N.Y.S.2d 208, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13341 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

In a habeas corpus proceeding pursuant to section 72 of the Domestic Relations Law to determine the visitation rights of the petitioner grandparents, they appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered February 18, 1976, which, after a hearing, dismissed the proceeding. Order reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs or disbursements, writ sustained, and matter remanded to Special Term for further proceedings consistent herewith. "Animosity between the mother of the children and their grandparents is not a proper basis for the denial of visitation privileges to the grandparents; nor is it a proper yardstick by which to measure the best interests of the children” (Lo Presti v Lo Presti, 51 AD2d 578). "Visits with a grandparent are often a precious part of a child’s experience and there are benefits which devolve upon the grandchild from the relationship with his grandparents which he cannot derive from any other relationship. Neither the Legislature nor this Court is blind to human truths which grandparents and grandchildren have always known” (Mimkon v Ford, 66 NJ 426, 437). Accordingly, the instant writ should have been sustained. We remand the proceeding to Special Term to fix (1) the visitation privileges of the grandparents and (2) the conditions for the exercise thereof. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Damiani, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Weis v. Rivera
29 A.D.3d 812 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Principato v. Lombardi
19 A.D.3d 602 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Michael v. Hertzler
900 P.2d 1144 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1995)
Smith v. Jones
155 Misc. 2d 254 (NYC Family Court, 1992)
Emanuel S. v. Joseph E.
577 N.E.2d 27 (New York Court of Appeals, 1991)
Kampf v. Worth
108 A.D.2d 841 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Weisman v. Weisman
107 A.D.2d 805 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Layton v. Foster
95 A.D.2d 77 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Johansen v. Lanphear
95 A.D.2d 973 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Augustine B. C v. Michael B.
84 A.D.2d 740 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Shadders v. Brock
101 Misc. 2d 11 (New York Family Court, 1979)
Lachow v. Barasch
57 A.D.2d 896 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Ehrlich v. Ressner
55 A.D.2d 953 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
53 A.D.2d 633, 384 N.Y.S.2d 208, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vacula-v-blume-nyappdiv-1976.