Lizza Industries, Inc. v. Long Island Lighting Co.
This text of 329 N.E.2d 664 (Lizza Industries, Inc. v. Long Island Lighting Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals sua sponte upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution and that the doctrine of implied severance is not applicable because the finally determined cause of action is not discrete from the transactions giving rise to counterclaims [755]*755which are not finally determined. (See Behren v Papworth, 30 NY2d 532; Walker v Sears, Roebuck & Co., 36 NY2d 695; Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, pp 81, 84-93.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
329 N.E.2d 664, 36 N.Y.2d 754, 368 N.Y.S.2d 830, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 1791, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lizza-industries-inc-v-long-island-lighting-co-ny-1975.