Kopel v. County of Oneida
406 N.E.2d 1081, 49 N.Y.2d 999, 429 N.Y.S.2d 188, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2352
This text of 406 N.E.2d 1081 (Kopel v. County of Oneida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kopel v. County of Oneida, 406 N.E.2d 1081, 49 N.Y.2d 999, 429 N.Y.S.2d 188, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2352 (N.Y. 1980).
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution (see Walker v Sears, Roebuck & Co., 36 NY2d 695; Lizza Inds. v Long Is. Light. Co., 36 NY2d 754).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Walker v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
325 N.E.2d 872 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
Lizza Industries, Inc. v. Long Island Lighting Co.
329 N.E.2d 664 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
406 N.E.2d 1081, 49 N.Y.2d 999, 429 N.Y.S.2d 188, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kopel-v-county-of-oneida-ny-1980.