Kopel v. County of Oneida
406 N.E.2d 1081, 49 N.Y.2d 999, 429 N.Y.S.2d 188, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2352
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution (see Walker v Sears, Roebuck & Co., 36 NY2d 695; Lizza Inds. v Long Is. Light. Co., 36 NY2d 754).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kopel v. County of Oneida, 406 N.E.2d 1081, 49 N.Y.2d 999, 429 N.Y.S.2d 188, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2352 (N.Y. 1980).
406 N.E.2d 1081 (Kopel v. County of Oneida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Walker v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
325 N.E.2d 872 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
Lizza Industries, Inc. v. Long Island Lighting Co.
329 N.E.2d 664 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)