Pasternack v. Sokoloff
412 N.E.2d 1324, 51 N.Y.2d 797, 433 N.Y.S.2d 99, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2654
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution (see Lizza Inds. v Long Is. Light. Co., 36 NY2d 754; Walker v Sears, Roebuck & Co., 36 NY2d 695).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pasternack v. Sokoloff, 412 N.E.2d 1324, 51 N.Y.2d 797, 433 N.Y.S.2d 99, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2654 (N.Y. 1980).
412 N.E.2d 1324 (Pasternack v. Sokoloff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Walker v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
325 N.E.2d 872 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
Lizza Industries, Inc. v. Long Island Lighting Co.
329 N.E.2d 664 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)