Pasternack v. Sokoloff
412 N.E.2d 1324, 51 N.Y.2d 797, 433 N.Y.S.2d 99, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2654
This text of 412 N.E.2d 1324 (Pasternack v. Sokoloff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pasternack v. Sokoloff, 412 N.E.2d 1324, 51 N.Y.2d 797, 433 N.Y.S.2d 99, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2654 (N.Y. 1980).
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution (see Lizza Inds. v Long Is. Light. Co., 36 NY2d 754; Walker v Sears, Roebuck & Co., 36 NY2d 695).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Walker v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
325 N.E.2d 872 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
Lizza Industries, Inc. v. Long Island Lighting Co.
329 N.E.2d 664 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
412 N.E.2d 1324, 51 N.Y.2d 797, 433 N.Y.S.2d 99, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pasternack-v-sokoloff-ny-1980.