Orenstein Snitow Sutak & Pollack, P. C. v. Chazen
406 N.E.2d 1081, 49 N.Y.2d 999, 429 N.Y.S.2d 188, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2353
This text of 406 N.E.2d 1081 (Orenstein Snitow Sutak & Pollack, P. C. v. Chazen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Orenstein Snitow Sutak & Pollack, P. C. v. Chazen, 406 N.E.2d 1081, 49 N.Y.2d 999, 429 N.Y.S.2d 188, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2353 (N.Y. 1980).
Opinion
Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals sua sponte, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of [1000]*1000the Constitution (Walker v Sears, Roebuck & Co., 36 NY2d 695; Lizza Inds. v Long Is. Light. Co., 36 NY2d 754).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Walker v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
325 N.E.2d 872 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
Lizza Industries, Inc. v. Long Island Lighting Co.
329 N.E.2d 664 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
406 N.E.2d 1081, 49 N.Y.2d 999, 429 N.Y.S.2d 188, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orenstein-snitow-sutak-pollack-p-c-v-chazen-ny-1980.