Orenstein Snitow Sutak & Pollack, P. C. v. Chazen

406 N.E.2d 1081, 49 N.Y.2d 999, 429 N.Y.S.2d 188, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2353
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 29, 1980·Published

Opinion

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals sua sponte, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of [1000]*1000the Constitution (Walker v Sears, Roebuck & Co., 36 NY2d 695; Lizza Inds. v Long Is. Light. Co., 36 NY2d 754).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orenstein Snitow Sutak & Pollack, P. C. v. Chazen, 406 N.E.2d 1081, 49 N.Y.2d 999, 429 N.Y.S.2d 188, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2353 (N.Y. 1980).

406 N.E.2d 1081 (Orenstein Snitow Sutak & Pollack, P. C. v. Chazen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walker v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
325 N.E.2d 872 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
Lizza Industries, Inc. v. Long Island Lighting Co.
329 N.E.2d 664 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)