Lewis v. State

297 S.W.3d 667, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1671, 2009 WL 4279548
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lewis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 781
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 24, 2009·No. ED 92677·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Larry Lewis (Movant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Francois County denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing. Movant asserts that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion based on his claims that his trial counsel was ineffective for: (1) eliciting “uncharged crimes evidence”; and (2) failing to adequately prepare an opening statement.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and we find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying Movant post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lewis v. State, 297 S.W.3d 667, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1671, 2009 WL 4279548 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

297 S.W.3d 667 (Lewis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.