Lewis v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Lewis v. State

312 S.W.3d 486, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 781, 2010 WL 2284207

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 8, 2010·No. ED 93434·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

LaMonica R. Lewis appeals the judgment denying her Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

LaMonica R. Lewis appeals the judgment denying her Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

Lewis v. State, 312 S.W.3d 486, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 781, 2010 WL 2284207 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

312 S.W.3d 486 (Lewis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related