Lewis v. State

291 S.W.3d 766, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 849, 2009 WL 1664702
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lewis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 781
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 16, 2009·No. ED 92161·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Keith Lewis (Movant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying without a hearing his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lewis v. State, 291 S.W.3d 766, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 849, 2009 WL 1664702 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

291 S.W.3d 766 (Lewis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. Rollet Bros. Trucking Co., Inc.
291 S.W.3d 766 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)