Lewis v. State

273 S.W.3d 79, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1458, 2008 WL 4773423
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lewis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 781
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 4, 2008·No. WD 68604·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Darin Lewis (Lewis) appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief based on ineffective assistance of counsel. On appeal, Lewis argues that the court erred in denying his motion because *80 his trial counsel’s failure to call a witness to bolster his self-defense claim fell below the standard of care of a reasonably competent attorney and prejudiced the trial’s outcome. Having carefully considered Lewis’s contentions on appeal, we find no basis for reversing the decision of the trial court. A published formal opinion would have no precedential value, and the parties have been provided with a memorandum explaining the reasoning of the court. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lewis v. State, 273 S.W.3d 79, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1458, 2008 WL 4773423 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

273 S.W.3d 79 (Lewis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.