Leviton Et Al. v. United States
Opinions
Memorandum filed by Mr. Justice Frankfurter.
Memorandum of
This seems to me to be another instance where it becomes helpful to an understanding of the exercise of the Court’s discretionary jurisdiction in granting or denying certiorari, to indicate the kind of question that did not commend itself to at least four Justices as appropriate for review by this Court. Several questions were raised by the petition for certiorari. It suffices to indicate the nature of only one, which can be most helpfully conveyed by giving the views of the Court of Appeals and of the dissenting opinion. 193 F. 2d 848.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
343 U.S. 946 (Leviton Et Al. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.