Lees v. CDCR/SVSP-LVN Singsong

• Court: District Court, N.D. California
• Decided: March 4, 2022
• Docket: 4:19-cv-01603
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ALEXANDER LEES, Case No. 19-cv-01603-HSG 8 Plaintiff, ORDER TO FILE AND SERVE STATEMENT OF DEATH 9 v. 10 SINGSONG, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 Defendants have filed, under seal, a Report of E-Service Waiver indicating that defendant 14 Singsong is deceased. To maintain this action against defendant Singsong, Plaintiff must take the 15 actions detailed below. 16 DISCUSSION 17 I. Claims Against Defendant Singsong 18 The operative complaint states a cognizable Eighth Amendment claim and a cognizable 19 due process claim against defendant Singsong. Plaintiff seeks declaratory relief, a preliminary and 20 permanent injunction ordering all disciplinary actions stemming from the relevant incident be 21 expunged from his central file and ordering the cessation of physical violence and threats directed 22 at him; and compensatory and punitive damages. See generally Dkt. Nos. 22, 26. 23 The law of the forum state determines whether a section 1983 action survives or is 24 extinguished upon the death of a party. See 42 U.S.C. § 1988(a); Carlson v. Green, 446 U.S. 14, 25 24 (1980) (cause of action for Eighth Amendment violation survives the death of a party); 26 Robertson v. Wegmann, 436 U.S. 584, 592-95 (1978). Under California law, “[e]xcept as 27 otherwise provided by statute, a cause of action for or against a person is not lost by reason of the 1 § 377.20(a). “Subject to Part 4 (commencing with Section 9000) of Division 7 of the Probate 2 Code governing creditor claims, a cause of action against a decedent that survives may be asserted 3 against the decedent’s personal representative or, to the extent provided by statute, against the 4 decedent’s successor in interest.” Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 377.40. Plaintiff’s claim for punitive 5 damages is extinguished by defendant Singsong’s death, see Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 377.42, but 6 the remaining claims survive. 7 II. Ordering Defendants to File and Serve Suggestion of Death 8 The Court is mindful of the limitations posed by Plaintiff’s pro se and incarcerated status. 9 Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Defendants to file in the record a statement or suggestion of 10 death of defendant Singsong and serve it upon Plaintiff in the manner indicated by Federal Rule of 11 Civil Procedure 25(a)(3). Defendants are also required to serve the statement or suggestion of 12 death on non-party successors or representatives of defendant Singsong “in the manner provided 13 by Rule 4 for the service of a summons.” Barlow v. Ground, 39 F.3d 231, 233 (9th Cir. 1994). 14 The statement or suggestion of death shall include the names and contact information for 15 Singsong’s non-party successors or representatives, and shall identify the county where defendant 16 Singsong’s estate is being administered. Service of the statement or suggestion of death on 17 Plaintiff will initiate a 90-day period during which Plaintiff may seek to substitute a proper 18 defendant in place of Singsong.1 19 III. Steps to Maintain the Action Against Defendant Singsong 20 To maintain this action against defendant Singsong, Plaintiff must (1) comply with the 21 state probate code requirements for pursuing a creditor’s claim against a deceased defendant’s 22 personal representative in the appropriate probate court, and (2) file a motion for substitution of 23 Singsong’s personal representative with this Court. 24 The state probate code requires the following:

26 1 Rule 25 “requires two affirmative steps in order to trigger the running of the 90 day period”; “[f]irst, a party must formally suggest the death of the party upon the record,” and “[s]econd, the 27 suggesting party must serve other parties and nonparty successors or representatives of the (a) An action or proceeding pending against the decedent at the time 1 of death may not be continued against the decedent’s personal representative unless all of the following conditions are satisfied: 2 (1) A claim is first filed as provided in this part. 3 (2) The claim is rejected in whole or in part. 4 (3) Within three months after the notice of rejection is given, 5 the plaintiff applies to the court in which the action or proceeding is pending for an order to substitute the personal 6 representative in the action or proceeding. This paragraph applies only if the notice of rejection contains a statement 7 that the plaintiff has three months within which to apply for an order for substitution. 8 (b) No recovery shall be allowed in the action against property in the 9 decedent’s estate unless proof is made of compliance with this section. 10 Cal. Prob. Code § 9370. A creditor claim “shall be filed with the court and a copy shall be served 11 on the personal representative, or on a person who is later appointed and qualified as personal 12 representative.” Cal. Prob. Code § 9150. 13 Fed. R. Civ. P. 25 provides 90 days during which “[a] motion for substitution may be made 14 by any party or by the decedent’s successor or representative.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a)(1). Service 15 of the statement or suggestion of death on Plaintiff will initiate a 90-day period during which 16 Plaintiff may seek to substitute a proper defendant in place of Singsong. 17 If Plaintiff does not proceed with filing a creditor’s claim in probate court against 18 Singsong’s estate and seeking substitution of Singsong’s representative as a defendant in this 19 Court within 90 days after the statement of death has been served upon him, the Court will dismiss 20 defendant Singsong from this action, as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a)(1) without further notice 21 to Plaintiff. Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a)(1) (“If the motion [to substitute] is not made within 90 days 22 after service of a statement noting the death, the action by or against the decedent must be 23 dismissed.”) (emphasis added). 24 CONCLUSION 25 For the reasons set forth above, the Court orders Defendants to file in the record a 26 statement or suggestion of death of defendant Singsong and serve it upon Plaintiff in the manner 27 indicated by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(a)(3). Defendants are also required to serve the 1 statement or suggestion of death on non-party successors or representatives of defendant Singsong 2 || “in the manner provided by Rule 4 for the service of a summons.” Barlow v. Ground, 39 F.3d 3 231, 233 (9th Cir. 1994). The statement or suggestion of death shall include the names and 4 || contact information for Singsong’s non-party successors or representatives, and shall identify the 5 county where defendant Singsong’s estate is being administered. Within 90 days of being served 6 || the statement of death, Plaintiff shall (1) comply with the state probate code requirements for 7 || pursuing a creditor’s claim against a deceased defendant’s personal representative in the 8 || appropriate probate court, and (2) file a motion for substitution of Singsong’s personal 9 || representative with this Court. If Plaintiff fails to comply with the deadlines set forth in this order, 10 || this action cannot proceed against defendant Singsong and the Court will dismiss defendant 11 Singsong from this action without further notice to Plaintiff. 12 IT IS SO ORDERED.

13 || Dated: 3/4/2022 HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. IS United States District Judge 16

= 17

Z 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28